Skip to content

People & use

Explanation & redress: what AI regulations require

Right to explanation, contestation, human review, feedback.

21 requirements · 13 regulations · 5 checks

Requirements by regulation

EUAI Act1

EX-033

Right to explanation of individual decision-making Art. 86

UKUK principles3

UK-02

Appropriate transparency and explainability Principle 2

UK-05

Contestability and redress Principle 5

UK-06

Safeguards on significant automated decisions UK GDPR Art. 22A-22D

CoECoE Convention1

COE-14

Effective remedies and procedural safeguards Art. 14, 15

USNIST AI RMF4

GOVERN-5.1

Organizational policies and practices are in place to collect, consider, prioritize, and integrate feedback from those external to the team that developed or deployed the AI system regarding the potential individual and societal impacts related to AI risks. GOVERN

GOVERN-5.2

Mechanisms are established to enable the team that developed or deployed AI systems to regularly incorporate adjudicated feedback from relevant AI actors into system design and implementation. GOVERN

MAP-5.2

Practices and personnel for supporting regular engagement with relevant AI actors and integrating feedback about positive, negative, and unanticipated impacts are in place and documented. MAP

MEASURE-3.3

Feedback processes for end users and impacted communities to report problems and appeal system outcomes are established and integrated into AI system evaluation metrics. MEASURE

COColorado AI Act1

CO-07

Consumer notice, adverse decision explanation, correction and human appeal §6-1-1703(4)

CACCPA ADMT2

ADMT-02

Right to opt out or human appeal §7221

ADMT-03

Right to access logic and outcome §7222

NYCNYC LL 1441

NYC-03

Candidate notice 10 business days before, alternative process §20-871(b)

USUS federal1

USF-03

Minimum practices for high-impact AI: testing, impact assessment, oversight, monitoring, appeal M-25-21 §4

CANCanada1

CAN-03

Inform of a fully automated decision and allow submissions to a human Loi 25, art. 12.1

BRPL 23382

BR-06

Right to explanation Arts. 6 I, 7

BR-07

Contestation and human review Arts. 6 II, 6 III, 9

KRAI Basic Act1

KR-04

High-impact measures: risk management, explainability, user protection, oversight, documentation Art. 34

CNChina GenAI1

CN-06

User protection: minors, complaints, reporting GenAI Art. 10, 15

Checks in this theme

Most shared first

Code	Check	Used by
VER-033-D-01	Decision explanation procedure documented	AI Act PL 2338 Canada CoE Convention RGPD UK principles Colorado AI Act
CHK-BR-CONTEST	Procedure to contest a decision and obtain human review published	PL 2338 CoE Convention RGPD UK principles CCPA ADMT Colorado AI Act US federal
VER-033-D-02	System explanation capability verified	AI Act PL 2338 AI Basic Act UK principles
VER-033-D-03	Explanations provided on request within a reasonable timeframe	AI Act PL 2338 RGPD CCPA ADMT
CHK-STAKEHOLDER-FEEDBACK	Mechanisms collect, adjudicate and integrate external stakeholder / user feedback	China GenAI NIST AI RMF

Related themes

Transparency & notice Synthetic content Human oversight

Run these requirements across all your AI systems

TrustFlow inventories your systems, qualifies them under each regulation and collects evidence once for every referential.