AI Act vs Colorado AI Act: what they share and how they differ

AI Act and Colorado AI Act share 10 of 24 control themes and 8 checks. 75% of Colorado AI Act requirements can be proven with checks AI Act already uses, 21% the other way round.

EURegulationPhasing in

AI Act

How to make an AI system compliant with the EU AI Act

33 requirementsNext Aug 2, 2027
COStatuteIn force

Colorado AI Act

How to comply with the Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205)

8 requirementsNext —
10/24shared control themes
8shared checks
75%of Colorado AI Act requirements covered by AI Act evidence
21%of AI Act requirements covered by Colorado AI Act evidence

At a glance

AI Act Colorado AI Act
JurisdictionEuropean UnionColorado
KindRegulationStatute
StatusPhasing inIn force
BindingYes sameYes same
Object analysedAI systemAutomated decision
ScopeProviders, deployers, importers and distributors of AI systems; providers of GPAI models.Developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems doing business in Colorado.
Territorial reachExtraterritorial: applies when the system is placed on the EU market or its output is used in the EU.Doing business in Colorado, decisions about residents.
PenaltiesUp to €35M or 7% of worldwide turnover (prohibited practices); €15M or 3% (other obligations); €7.5M or 1% (incorrect information).Unfair trade practice; Attorney General enforcement only. Affirmative defence when aligned with NIST AI RMF or ISO 42001.
Qualification axesAI Act risk level, Organisation role, General-purpose modelHigh-risk system (consequential decision)
RolesProvider, Deployer, GPAI providerDeveloper, Deployer
Requirements338
Next milestoneAug 2, 2027, Annex I high risk (regulated products); GPAI placed on the market before Aug 2025—

Theme by theme

requirements per theme

What they share: one piece of evidence, two frameworks

8

CodeCheckRequirements AI ActRequirements Colorado AI Act
VER-003-01Documented and up-to-date risk register
VER-003-02Residual risks communicated to deployers
VER-004-01Documented data governance (collection process, bias, quality)
VER-007-01Instructions for use complete and compliant with Art. 13
VER-013-F-04Communication to market surveillance authorities in the event of risk
VER-018-D-01Persons informed of the interaction with an AI system
VER-029-D-01Affected persons informed of the use of the AI system
VER-033-D-01Decision explanation procedure documented

Differences: requirements specific to each framework

Requirements with no check serving the other framework: the extra work.

AI Act

26

EX-001
EX-005
Technical documentation Art. 11 + Annexe IV
EX-008
EX-010
QMS Art. 17
EX-011
EX-014
Cooperation with authorities Art. 21 + Art. 26§12
EX-016
CE marking Art. 48
EX-019
DPIA Art. 26§9
EX-020
FRIA Art. 27
EX-023
Accessibility Art. 16(l)
EX-024
EX-026
Value chain Art. 25
EX-027
Compliant use Art. 26§1
EX-028
Input data Art. 26§4
EX-031

Timelines

PastSet in the textPotentialTo verify
Apr 21, 2021AI Act · Commission proposal
May 17, 2024Colorado AI Act · Signed into law
Jul 12, 2024AI Act · Published in the Official Journal
Aug 1, 2024AI Act · Entry into force
Feb 2, 2025AI Act · Prohibited practices (Art. 5) and AI literacy (Art. 4)
Jul 10, 2025AI Act · GPAI Code of Practice published
Aug 2, 2025AI Act · GPAI obligations, governance, penalties, notified bodies
Aug 28, 2025Colorado AI Act · SB 25B-004: delay to 30 June 2026
Nov 19, 2025AI Act · Digital Omnibus proposal: high-risk delay tied to standards
Jun 30, 2026Colorado AI Act · Effective date (2026 session amendments to verify)
Aug 2, 2026AI Act · General application: Art. 50, sandboxes, Annex III high risk (unless Omnibus delay)
Aug 2, 2027AI Act · Annex I high risk (regulated products); GPAI placed on the market before Aug 2025
Dec 2, 2027AI Act · Omnibus backstop for Annex III high risk
Aug 2, 2028AI Act · Omnibus backstop for Annex I high risk
Aug 2, 2030AI Act · High-risk systems of public authorities already in service (Art. 111)

Run these requirements across all your AI systems

TrustFlow inventories your systems, qualifies them under each regulation and collects evidence once for every referential.

Request a demo