PL 2338 vs ISO 42001: what they share and how they differ

PL 2338 and ISO 42001 share 11 of 24 control themes and 9 checks. 46% of ISO 42001 requirements can be proven with checks PL 2338 already uses, 35% the other way round.

BRBillUnder discussion

PL 2338

Preparing for the Brazil AI Bill (PL 2338/2023)

20 requirementsNext Oct 2026
INTLCertifiable standardVoluntary

ISO 42001

How to prepare for ISO/IEC 42001 certification

13 requirementsNext Dec 2026
11/24shared control themes
9shared checks
46%of ISO 42001 requirements covered by PL 2338 evidence
35%of PL 2338 requirements covered by ISO 42001 evidence

At a glance

PL 2338 ISO 42001
JurisdictionBrazilInternational
KindBillCertifiable standard
StatusUnder discussionVoluntary
BindingNo sameNo same
Object analysedAI systemOrganisation
ScopeDevelopers, distributors and appliers of AI systems.Organisations providing or using AI systems.
Territorial reachSystems provided or used in Brazil.International.
PenaltiesSenate text: up to BRL 50M or 2% of turnover per infringement; suspension.None; certification lost or refused.
Qualification axesPL 2338 risk level, Role (Art. 4)System impact level (Cl. 6.1.4)
RolesDeveloper, Distributor, ApplierProvider, User, Producer
Requirements2013
Next milestoneOct 2026, Vote pushed past the October 2026 electionsDec 2026, CEN-CENELEC JTC 21 harmonised standards for the AI Act (prEN 18286 QMS)

Theme by theme

requirements per theme

What they share: one piece of evidence, two frameworks

9

CodeCheckRequirements PL 2338Requirements ISO 42001
VER-004-01Documented data governance (collection process, bias, quality)
VER-004-02Input data relevant and representative in view of the intended purpose
VER-008-03Competent overseers assigned to the system
VER-005-01Complete technical documentation compliant with Annex IV
VER-007-01Instructions for use complete and compliant with Art. 13
VER-006-02Automatic logging operational and compliant
VER-020-D-01FRIA carried out in accordance with Art. 27
VER-022-F-01Risk and incident response procedure
VER-026-F-01Contractual responsibilities documented between provider and third parties

Differences: requirements specific to each framework

Requirements with no check serving the other framework: the extra work.

PL 2338

13

BR-01
BR-06
BR-07
Contestation and human review Arts. 6 II, 6 III, 9
BR-09
Applier documentation Art. 18 I.a, I.c, I.f
BR-12
Security testing Art. 18 II.c
BR-13
BR-19

Timelines

PastSet in the textPotentialTo verify
May 3, 2023PL 2338 · Filed in the Senate
Dec 18, 2023ISO 42001 · ISO/IEC 42001 published
Dec 10, 2024PL 2338 · Senate approval
May 2025PL 2338 · Special committee in the Chamber of Deputies
May 2025ISO 42001 · ISO/IEC 42005 (impact assessment)
Jul 2025ISO 42001 · ISO/IEC 42006 (certification bodies)
Oct 2026PL 2338 · Vote pushed past the October 2026 elections
Dec 2026ISO 42001 · CEN-CENELEC JTC 21 harmonised standards for the AI Act (prEN 18286 QMS)
Jun 2027PL 2338 · Possible adoption and start of the vacatio legis

Run these requirements across all your AI systems

TrustFlow inventories your systems, qualifies them under each regulation and collects evidence once for every referential.

Request a demo